Sanjay Dutt

Criminal Appeal No. 897 of 2008 Parvez Nazir Ahmed Shaikh (A-12) …..Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Thr. CBI-STF, Mumbai

14. League of Nations Convention (1937): “All criminal acts directed against a State along with intended or calculated to create

Injured Witnesses: 423) It was pointed out that around 50 people suffered injuries due to the explosion which took place

Appointment of Special Executive Magistrates 209) It was further contended that Special Executive Magistrates are not trained Magistrates and they

Deposition of Badrinath Bishansingh Sharma (PW-29) (i) PW-29 is a hawker at Zaveri Bazaar. He is an eye-witness to the

Recoveries: 215) Mr. Jaspal Singh, learned senior counsel for A-1 submitted that based on the statement of Mohd. Hanif (PW-282)

Evidence with regard to purchase of scooter: 348) The prosecution pointed out that the scooter which was planted by the

Mitigating Circumstances: 504) Mr. Jaspal Singh, learned senior counsel submitted the following as the mitigating circumstances to reduce the severity

Final Analysis relating to A-1 241) From the total appreciation of the evidence as produced by the prosecution in support

Conspiracy 357) As mentioned above, a common charge of conspiracy was framed against all the accused persons and in order

Charges: 253) The following common charge of conspiracy was framed against all the co-conspirators including the appellants herein. The relevant

Investigation, Recoveries and FSL Reports: 371) Various articles were sent to FSL vide Exhibit Nos. 1850, 1852 and 2423 for

Confessional Statements of co-accused: Confessional Statement of Bashir Ahmed Usman Gani Khairulla (A-13) 262) Confessional statement of A-13 under Section

Criminal Appeal Nos. 864-865 of 2008 Abdul Gani Ismail Turk (A-11) … Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Through STF,

Supreme Court of India Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi … on 21 March, 2013 Author: .…………………………J.

Evidence: 255) The evidence against the appellants is in the nature of their own confessions, confessions made by other co-accused,

Confessional Statement of co-accused: 365) A perusal of the above confession of the appellant (A-11) shows that he was playing

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1) 4) At the first instance, let us consider the charges, materials placed by the prosecution,