Bombay Stock Exchange

Criminal Appeal No. 897 of 2008 Parvez Nazir Ahmed Shaikh (A-12) …..Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Thr. CBI-STF, Mumbai

14. League of Nations Convention (1937): “All criminal acts directed against a State along with intended or calculated to create

Injured Witnesses: 423) It was pointed out that around 50 people suffered injuries due to the explosion which took place

Criminal Appeal Nos. 864-865 of 2008 Abdul Gani Ismail Turk (A-11) … Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Through STF,

Observations made in para 23 are also noteworthy: “23. In view of the settled legal position, it is not possible

Evidence: 405) The evidence against the appellant (A-16) is in the form of:- (i) his own confession; (ii) confessions made

Criminal Appeal Nos. 628-629 of 2008 Mohammed Mushtaq Moosa Tarani (A-44) ….. Appellant vs State of Maharashtra, Through STF, CBI

Supreme Court of India Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi … on 21 March, 2013 Author: .…………………………J.

Confessional Statement of co-accused: 365) A perusal of the above confession of the appellant (A-11) shows that he was playing

Appointment of Special Executive Magistrates 209) It was further contended that Special Executive Magistrates are not trained Magistrates and they

Deposition of Nandkumar Anant Chaugule (PW-444). The deposition of PW-444 was recorded on 05/06.10.1998. At the time of the incident,

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon (A-1) 4) At the first instance, let us consider the charges, materials placed by the prosecution,

Retracted Confessions: 368) We have already held that the confessional statement made by a person under Section 15 of TADA

Recoveries: 215) Mr. Jaspal Singh, learned senior counsel for A-1 submitted that based on the statement of Mohd. Hanif (PW-282)

Mitigating Circumstances: 504) Mr. Jaspal Singh, learned senior counsel submitted the following as the mitigating circumstances to reduce the severity

Criminal Appeal No.365 of 2008 Mohammed Shoeb Mohammed Kasam Ghansar (A-9) ….. Appellant(s) vs The State of Maharashtra, Through STF,

44) On 27.07.2007, the Designated Court again read the following conclusion in respect of A-1. “82 a) Accused no. 1

Evidence with regard to the vehicle (Jeep) used in the Blast: 375) Three commander jeeps were purchased by Mohammed Shafi

Final Analysis relating to A-1 241) From the total appreciation of the evidence as produced by the prosecution in support