Raigad

14. League of Nations Convention (1937): “All criminal acts directed against a State along with intended or calculated to create

Criminal Appeal No. 897 of 2008 Parvez Nazir Ahmed Shaikh (A-12) …..Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Thr. CBI-STF, Mumbai

Injured Witnesses: 423) It was pointed out that around 50 people suffered injuries due to the explosion which took place

Deposition of Prosecution Witnesses: Deposition of Mohammed Usman Ahmed Zan Khan (PW-2) (Approver) 264) PW-2 deposed as under:- Reference to

Evidence with regard to purchase of scooter: 348) The prosecution pointed out that the scooter which was planted by the

Deposition of Md. Usman Jan Khan (PW-2) Approver 148) In the light of the above principles, it is useful to

Investigation, Recoveries and FSL Report: 267) On 12.03.1993, Shantaram Gangaram Hire (PW-562), Police Officer, visited the blast site i.e., Fishermen’s

Conspiracy 357) As mentioned above, a common charge of conspiracy was framed against all the accused persons and in order

Evidence of Shri P K. Jain (PW-189) 195) He joined Maharashtra Police in January 1983 as an Assistant Superintendent of

Deposition of Prosecution Witnesses: Deposition of Ravindra Sitaram Vichare (PW-17) 294) The deposition of PW-17 was recorded on 20.11.1995. The

Investigation, Recoveries and FSL Reports: 371) Various articles were sent to FSL vide Exhibit Nos. 1850, 1852 and 2423 for

Grant of Pardon under Section 306 of the Code to Mohammed Usman Ahmed Zan Khan/(PW-2) / Approver 185) It was

TERRORISM: 433) The term “terrorism” is a concept that is commonly and widely used in everyday parlance and is derived

Confessional Statement of the appellant – Mohammed Mushtaq Moosa Tarani (A-44) 288) The prosecution pointed out the involvement of the

Criminal Appeal Nos. 864-865 of 2008 Abdul Gani Ismail Turk (A-11) … Appellant(s) versus The State of Maharashtra Through STF,

Observations made in para 23 are also noteworthy: “23. In view of the settled legal position, it is not possible

Evidence: 405) The evidence against the appellant (A-16) is in the form of:- (i) his own confession; (ii) confessions made

Criminal Appeal Nos. 628-629 of 2008 Mohammed Mushtaq Moosa Tarani (A-44) ….. Appellant vs State of Maharashtra, Through STF, CBI

Supreme Court of India Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi … on 21 March, 2013 Author: .…………………………J.